Comparison · Vexta
Vexta vs Intruder: an honest comparison.
Intruder is a continuous external vulnerability scanner aimed at small-to-mid teams. Vexta covers the same external surface plus internal infrastructure, web apps, APIs, and code - with an AI triage layer on top of the raw findings.
This Vexta vs Intruder comparison is built from first-hand work: customers who have used both, engineers who have written exploits against the same target with each scanner, and procurement teams who have negotiated both contracts. No paid placements, no affiliate links - we sell Vexta, so the bias is disclosed, but every row below is verifiable from public Intruder documentation.
Pick Vexta if
You want one scanner that covers external + internal + apps + dependencies, with AI-prioritized findings and a self-hosted option.
Pick Intruder if
You only need external scans and prefer a hands-off SaaS with zero infrastructure to think about.
There is no single right answer in a Vexta vs Intruder decision. Both products solve the same surface problem - finding vulnerabilities before an attacker does - but they make different bets about who is operating the tool, how much manual review is acceptable, and what the report has to look like for downstream auditors.
The honest test is this: download both, point them at the same target, and compare the findings 48 hours later. We offer that as a paid pilot with Vexta. If you want the same from Intruder, ask their sales team for a free trial credit - most will accommodate.
Side-by-side
Vexta vs Intruder: feature comparison
| Feature | Vexta | Intruder |
|---|---|---|
| External vulnerability scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Internal / authenticated network scans Intruder requires their Pro plan and an agent. | ✓ | ∼ |
| Web app + API DAST Intruder uses a partner integration for deeper app testing. | ✓ | ∼ |
| OWASP Top 10 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| CVE database + NVD updates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Software bill-of-materials (SBOM) | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI-triaged severity + fix guidance | ✓ | ✕ |
| Self-host option | ✓ | ✕ |
| CI/CD integration (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins) | ✓ | ∼ |
| PDF + Markdown reports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier | Generous - 1 target, local AI | 14-day trial only |
Common questions
Is Vexta a drop-in replacement for Intruder?
For external scanning, yes. Vexta also covers internal networks, web apps, APIs, and code - Intruder needs partner integrations or higher tiers for those. If you only need external scans of a handful of public-facing assets, both work; if you want one tool for everything, Vexta is built for that.
How does pricing compare?
Vexta has a free tier (single target, local AI) and paid Essentials/Pro/Enterprise plans. Intruder doesn't publish a free tier and starts at the trial. For mid-size teams (5–20 engineers), Vexta typically lands 30–50% cheaper than Intruder's equivalent tier.
Can I run Vexta entirely on my own infrastructure?
Yes. The self-hosted option runs on AWS, GCP, Azure, Hetzner, or bare metal. Findings never leave your network. Intruder is SaaS-only - your scan data lives in their cloud.
Does Vexta integrate with our existing security stack?
Yes. SARIF + JSON output integrates with GitHub Code Scanning, Snyk, DefectDojo, Jira, Slack, and any SIEM. CI/CD plugins for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins, Bitbucket.
What about support?
Essentials: community + docs. Pro: email support (24-hour response). Enterprise: dedicated engineer, quarterly architecture reviews, custom onboarding.
Try Vexta on one target.
No agents to install, no card to enter, no SDR call. Free tier covers single-target scanning indefinitely.